Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:45542 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752782AbdBGHI3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2017 02:08:29 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: Larry Finger Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ping-Ke Shih , shaofu Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11 V3] rtlwifi: Fix programing CAM content sequence. References: <20170120212716.29887-1-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <20170120212716.29887-1-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <20170120212716.29887-1-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <20170120212716.29887-2-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <87bmufa3nu.fsf@codeaurora.org> <90709cde-bcca-eb57-3a61-4c318ed37c92@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 09:08:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <90709cde-bcca-eb57-3a61-4c318ed37c92@lwfinger.net> (Larry Finger's message of "Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:42:50 -0600") Message-ID: <8737fq8olz.fsf@codeaurora.org> (sfid-20170207_080833_075403_016652CD) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Larry Finger writes: > On 02/06/2017 06:45 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Larry Finger writes: >> >>> From: Ping-Ke Shih >>> >>> There is a potential race condition when the control byte of a CAM >>> entry is written first. Write in reverse order to correct the condition. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih >>> Signed-off-by: shaofu >>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger >>> --- >>> V2 - no changes >>> V3 - no changes >> >> I missed in my reply to v2 that you had already sent v3 from this >> patchset. Strange that I don't see this v3 patchset either in patchwork, >> only v1. >> >> Try submitting v4 in case it was just a temporary glitch in patchwork. >> But if that doesn't help I'll apply these manually. > > I have no idea why my patches are not getting handled by patchwork, > but V4 is not there either. Yeah, that's odd. I do see your patches on the mailing list so I guess something in this set is breaking patchwork's email parser. The only notable difference I saw that in our patches the tags were in this format: [PATCH 01/11 V4] But normally we use something like this: [PATCH V4 01/11] I don't know if that would cause patchwork to fail and I don't really have time to investigate it right now. I'll just apply V4 manually now and let's hope that the problem doesn't reappear. -- Kalle Valo