Return-path: Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:46734 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751291AbdBXVvw (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:51:52 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: remove TI nfcwilink driver From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:43:02 -0800 Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Lauro Ramos Venancio , Aloisio Almeida Jr , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-wireless , Ilan Elias Message-Id: <9E986B17-64EA-46E5-BEE3-76217E31B0D1@holtmann.org> (sfid-20170224_225218_811476_99BD2559) References: <20170125222307.3044-1-robh@kernel.org> <3B67FD13-A482-4BEF-B619-DD9AF9CC129F@holtmann.org> To: Rob Herring Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Rob, >>> It appears that TI WiLink devices including NFC (WL185x/WL189x) never >>> shipped. The only information I found were announcements in Feb >>> 2012 about the parts. There's been no activity on this driver besided >>> common changes since initially added in Jan 2012. There's also no in >>> users that instantiate the platform device (nor DT bindings). >>> >>> This is a first step in removing TI ST (shared transport) driver in >>> favor of extending the BT hci_ll driver to support WL183x chips. >> >> since the firmware files TINfcInit_* also never made it into the linux-firmware tree, I have no idea who is using this driver. I am actually fine with removing it since it would be easy enough to bring back based on hci_ll driver once there is hardware to test this on. > > Ping. Someone going to pick up this patch? if Samuel does not have anything pending for his tree, I can take it through bluetooth-next tree. Regards Marcel