Return-path: Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:54415 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935003AbdCVTYO (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:24:14 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <20170322.114439.679826829857326050.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:23:15 +0100 Cc: Bjorn Andersson , "Gustavo F. Padovan" , Johan Hedberg , Eugene Krasnikov , Kalle Valo , Andy Gross , David Brown , arnd@arndb.de, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <21FCFC89-07EE-49EE-81C2-A138DD4C5F99@holtmann.org> (sfid-20170322_204006_728406_D16FFC8D) References: <20170320233544.1656-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20170322.114439.679826829857326050.davem@davemloft.net> To: "David S. Miller" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Dave, >> By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD >> API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol >> support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. >> >> As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually >> exclusive we have to change all client drivers in one commit, to make >> sure we have a working system before and after this transition. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson >> --- >> >> Based on v4.11-rc3 with Arnd's Kconfig dependency fixes for BT_QCOMSMD >> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/20/1038). > > Just some questions since I'm supposed to merge this into my net-next > tree. > > What is the status of the Kconfig dependency fix and how will I be > getting it? I acked that one separately and added you: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btqcomsmd: fix compile-test dependency > Second, should I merge all three of these patches to net-next or just > this one? I think you have to take all 3 patches. Otherwise it will break. Regards Marcel