Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:33694 "EHLO mail-pf0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751550AbdCVV5i (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:57:38 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o190so15208400pfo.0 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:57:33 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson To: David Miller Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, gustavo@padovan.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, k.eugene.e@gmail.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smd: Transition client drivers from smd to rpmsg Message-ID: <20170322215733.GH20094@minitux> (sfid-20170322_225814_830696_C247A629) References: <20170320233544.1656-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> <20170322.114439.679826829857326050.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170322.114439.679826829857326050.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed 22 Mar 11:44 PDT 2017, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Andersson > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:35:42 -0700 > > > By moving these client drivers to use RPMSG instead of the direct SMD > > API we can reuse them ontop of the newly added GLINK wire-protocol > > support found in the 820 and 835 Qualcomm platforms. > > > > As the new (RPMSG-based) and old SMD implementations are mutually > > exclusive we have to change all client drivers in one commit, to make > > sure we have a working system before and after this transition. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson > > --- > > > > Based on v4.11-rc3 with Arnd's Kconfig dependency fixes for BT_QCOMSMD > > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/20/1038). > > Just some questions since I'm supposed to merge this into my net-next > tree. > > What is the status of the Kconfig dependency fix and how will I be > getting it? > There are two Kconfig dependencies in play here, the first is c3104aae5d8c ("remoteproc: qcom: fix QCOM_SMD dependencies"), this was picked up by Linus yesterday and will as such be in v4.10-rc4. The other dependency, is the one Marcel wants you to pick up here is https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9635385/. It's on LKML, but if you want I can resend it with you as direct recipient, with Marcel's ack. Likely Arnd would like this fix to be sent upstream for v4.11 already. > Second, should I merge all three of these patches to net-next or just > this one? > I would like all three to be merged in this cycle and in addition I have a couple of patches coming up that will cause some minor conflicts with patch 2 - so I would prefer if patch 2 was available in a tag I can merge into my tree. Would it be possible for you to prepare merge all 4 (these 3 and the bluetooth fix) and prepare a tag for Andy, Marcel and myself to include in our trees? Regards, Bjorn