Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:38245 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753960AbdCXRzB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:55:01 -0400
Message-ID: <1490377801.21738.23.camel@linux.intel.com> (sfid-20170324_185515_264565_BAAD9642)
Subject: Re: Is NFC subsystem abandoned?
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: lauro.venancio@openbossa.org, aloisio.almeida@openbossa.org,
        sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:50:01 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170324.101446.630822222397402719.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1490371835.21738.15.camel@linux.intel.com>
         <20170324.101446.630822222397402719.davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 10:14 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:10:35 +0200
> 
> > Should I escalate to Linus?
> 
> Threats of "escalating" are never effective, please never do
> this.

Thanks for a hint.

Can't promise for "never", but will try to avoid them.

I was being afraid that it may be the case like with MTD or PWM where we
 missed few releases because of non-responsive maintainers at that time.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy