Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:6109 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754144AbdDEIJ1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 04:09:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:09:18 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Christophe Ricard Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] NFC: st21nfca: Fix obvious typo when check error code Message-ID: <20170405080918.GB2136@zurbaran.ger.intel.com> (sfid-20170405_101039_782172_74F2BFAF) References: <20170307102546.32224-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170307102546.32224-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andy, On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > We return -ENODEV if ACPI provides a GPIO resource. Looks really wrong. > If it has even been tested? > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > drivers/nfc/st21nfca/i2c.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) All 5 patches applied to nfc-next, thanks. Cheers, Samuel.