Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:46553 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751009AbdEaMxw (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 May 2017 08:53:52 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Adrian Chadd CC: Norik Dzhandzhapanyan , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per chain RSSI reporting Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:53:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87poepmbls.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20170531_145355_863320_C9FA1378) References: In-Reply-To: (Adrian Chadd's message of "Fri, 26 May 2017 18:12:18 -0700") Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Adrian Chadd writes: > I have something local that I've been meaning to push up to do this, > but with no smoothing. Ideally (!) smoothing is done optionally in > mac80211. > > What do you think about just committing the per-chain RSSI stuff to > mac80211 so it shows up right now, and then we figure out how to > express the smoothing in mac80211 or further up the layers? I think this is a good approach. --=20 Kalle Valo=