Return-path: Received: from mail-dm3nam03on0040.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.41.40]:44278 "EHLO NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750732AbdE0TZT (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2017 15:25:19 -0400 From: Norik Dzhandzhapanyan To: Adrian Chadd CC: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Ben Greear Subject: Re: [PATCH] Per chain RSSI reporting References: <21095854-07c7-7586-6a6e-e60c11932b84@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <8e314337-a1f0-5ed4-aa90-3f1a0e2d09fc@ethertronics.com> (sfid-20170527_212530_805583_49F69D5C) Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 12:25:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: We see this inconsistent/incorrect reporting in our RF chamber. Norik On 05/27/2017 09:39 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 27 May 2017 at 09:07, Ben Greear wrote: >> At low encoding rates, especially if it switches to a single-chain encod= ing, >> maybe the on-air signal really is stronger? >> >> Have you verified in some other manner than the signals reported by ath1= 0k >> are >> wrong? > Hiya, > > So yeah, multipath, higher TX rates =3D=3D weaker TX signal, TPC, etc are > all interesting to know about at the receiver. it's hard to separate > that out from the noise sometimes, but in some controlled deployments > its really obvious. > > > > -adrian > > The contents of this transmission are Ethertronics Inc. Confidential and ma= y contain proprietary or legally privileged information which may not be di= sclosed, copied or distributed without the express written consent of Ether= tronics Inc. The information is intended to be for the use of the individua= l or entity named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipie= nt, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the conte= nts of this information is prohibited. If you have received this transmissi= on in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so that we can arran= ge for the retrieval of the original documents at no cost to you. Alternati= vely, notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the mes= sage without disclosing it. Thank you