Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:56316 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711AbdEJQRi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 May 2017 12:17:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [v2,1/3] ath9k: Support channels in licensed bands To: Tom Psyborg , Adrian Chadd References: <20170323133048.30062-2-sw@simonwunderlich.de> <1811221.G4Vz0DPyQ8@prime> <12133a0e-b030-5b21-8de1-3bf7334d47df@fit.fraunhofer.de> <1863250.VEhGCjvYY0@prime> Cc: Simon Wunderlich , Kalle Valo , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , Mathias Kretschmer , Julian Calaby , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , ath9k-devel , Steve deRosier From: Ben Greear Message-ID: (sfid-20170510_181742_039137_82B49060) Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 09:17:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/10/2017 03:30 AM, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > > On 9 May 2017 at 19:50, Adrian Chadd > wrote: > > > (Note note: some of those channels have non-megahertz boundaries, > which means ... yeah, hello inter-operability boundaries. Hilarious.) > > > > -adrian > > > > From what I can tell, it seems like as long as your both points are configured with identical settings, you can use any channel/frequency/bandwidth combination > that hardware supports. Possibly even 802.11ac at 2.4 GHz if we got more than 100MHz of bandwidth from 2.4 to 2.5 GHz. The solution i've made myself doesn't > include all available channels but can serve as an example: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=353870#p353870 primary/sec HT channel option should also > be further extended. > > Cheers, Tom I've successfully used 802.11ac VHT-40 on 2.4Ghz band with ath10k...it just requires a few small changes in the mac80211 stack to allow it to be configured....just FYI. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com