Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:32877 "EHLO mail-pg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbdHaUVv (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:21:51 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t3so2114804pgt.0 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:21:47 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Ganapathi Bhat Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Cathy Luo , Xinming Hu , Zhiyuan Yang , James Cao , Mangesh Malusare Subject: Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: check for mfg_mode in add_virtual_intf Message-ID: <20170831202146.GA27509@google.com> (sfid-20170831_222158_192791_1FCC01AA) References: <1504118818-1749-1-git-send-email-gbhat@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1504118818-1749-1-git-send-email-gbhat@marvell.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:16:58AM +0530, Ganapathi Bhat wrote: > If driver is loaded with 'mfg_mode' enabled, then the sending > commands are not allowed. So, when mwifiex_send_cmd fails in > mwifiex_add_virtual_intf, driver must check for 'mfg_mode' before > returning error. > > Fixes: 7311ea850079 ("mwifiex: fix AP start problem for newly added interface") > Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Bhat > --- > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c > index ffada17..1856205 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c > @@ -2967,11 +2967,11 @@ struct wireless_dev *mwifiex_add_virtual_intf(struct wiphy *wiphy, > > ret = mwifiex_send_cmd(priv, HostCmd_CMD_SET_BSS_MODE, > HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, 0, NULL, true); > - if (ret) > + if (ret && !adapter->mfg_mode) It doesn't feel like ignoring errors is the best approach here, especially when it's only a single command that we could easily just skip. So, why don't you just skip it, like this? if (!adapter->mfg_mode) { ret = mwifiex_send_cmd(...); if (ret) goto err_set_bss_mode; } > goto err_set_bss_mode; > > ret = mwifiex_sta_init_cmd(priv, false, false); > - if (ret) > + if (ret && !adapter->mfg_mode) > goto err_sta_init; Same here; I think it's safe to just completely skip mwifiex_sta_init_cmd(), no? Brian > > mwifiex_setup_ht_caps(&wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ]->ht_cap, priv); > -- > 1.9.1 >