Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42914 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751510AbdIBIW1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Sep 2017 04:22:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 10:22:24 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Kalle Valo Cc: Larry Finger , Helmut Schaa , linux-wireless Subject: Re: RT2870 failure in kernel 4.12.8 Message-ID: <20170902082223.GA11293@redhat.com> (sfid-20170902_102238_417818_872DC675) References: <20170831075514.GA12340@redhat.com> <26ef3184-a19e-1bb7-7aa4-4e8647210763@lwfinger.net> <20170901085738.GA18397@redhat.com> <87y3pymqw2.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <87y3pymqw2.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:31:57PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Stanislaw Gruszka writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:33:28AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > >> Should the patch to wireless-drivers be annotated with a Stable reference so > >> that it is added to 4.12 and 4.13? > > > > According to Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt networking patches > > should not be marked cc:stable, instead a decent commit log should > > be written describing a bugfix. Which I believe it is done for > > this patch. > > But that's for net and net-next trees, not for wireless trees. With > wireless patches we use "Cc: stable@..." references. Oh, ok. I was confused by below part of Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst (because wireless drivers are located in drivers/net/) - If the patch covers files in net/ or drivers/net please follow netdev stable submission guidelines as described in Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt Thanks Stanislaw