Return-path: Received: from mail-sn1nam01on0048.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.32.48]:34496 "EHLO NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751915AbdIUICA (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:02:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:01:48 +0300 From: Sergey Matyukevich To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Igor Mitsyanko , Avinash Patil Subject: Re: [v2,1/2] qtnfmac: lock access to h/w in tx path Message-ID: <20170921080147.tvcztifyfwy2lp7g@bars> (sfid-20170921_100207_297460_0361B879) References: <20170918122950.32612-2-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <20170920123553.7121D6070F@smtp.codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170920123553.7121D6070F@smtp.codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Kalle, > > Fix tx path regression. Lock should be held when queuing packets > > to h/w fifos in order to properly handle configurations with > > multiple enabled interfaces. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Matyukevich > > 2 patches applied to wireless-drivers.git, thanks. > > 20da2ec06bfa qtnfmac: lock access to h/w in tx path > a715b3a0efe7 qtnfmac: cancel scans on wireless interface changes Could you please clarify a couple of points regarding wireless-drivers-next and wireless-drivers trees. I checked development process article at wireless.wiki.kernel.org, but it looks a bit outdated. So am I correct assuming the following: - these two fixes were applied to wireless-drivers because I asked to to queue them to 4.14 - these two fixes will show up in wireless-drivers-next at some point in the future after you move wireless-drivers-next forward, rebasing it on top of one of the upcoming "-rc" Regards, Sergey