Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:45762 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751714AbdIUNwI (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 09:52:08 -0400 Message-ID: <1506001926.2048.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20170921_155212_745730_527B0AEF) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wireless: return correct mandatory rates From: Johannes Berg To: Richard =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sch=FCtz?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:52:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20170908160712.8765-1-rschuetz@uni-koblenz.de> (sfid-20170908_180746_422254_8173A2C4) References: <20170907154744.28357-2-rschuetz@uni-koblenz.de> <20170908160712.8765-1-rschuetz@uni-koblenz.de> (sfid-20170908_180746_422254_8173A2C4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 18:07 +0200, Richard Schütz wrote: > Use IEEE80211_RATE_MANDATORY_G instead of IEEE80211_RATE_MANDATORY_B > to get > all mandatory rates in 2.4 GHz band. It is safe to do so because ERP > mandatory rates are a superset of HR/DSSS mandatory rates. Also limit > to > OFDM rates for 10 MHz and 5 MHz channels as originally intended by > commit > 74608aca4d82e. I don't understand this. Why should all ERP (Clause 18, 11g) rates be mandatory for the users of this? The way I see it, this would make us assume that all 2.4 GHz clients support ERP in IBSS, which may not be true? johannes