Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:55998 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752743AbdIRMwB (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:52:01 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Igor Mitsyanko , Avinash Patil Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] qtnfmac: abort scans on wireless interface changes References: <20170918080446.21763-1-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <20170918080446.21763-3-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <1505724068.13691.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20170918095713.mfn76hkdbo73k4fu@bars> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:51:57 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170918095713.mfn76hkdbo73k4fu@bars> (Sergey Matyukevich's message of "Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:57:13 +0300") Message-ID: <87shfkkw42.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20170918_145205_358775_21A0330A) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sergey Matyukevich writes: > By the way, is it ok to send corrected single patch in reply to this > discussion ? Or the appropriate way is to resend the whole patch set ? This has been a common question so I documented it: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#resubmit_the_whole_patchset I leave it as an exercise to the reader to find the answer, even though the URL even spoils it ;) -- Kalle Valo