Return-path: Received: from mail-sn1nam01on0086.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.32.86]:32780 "EHLO NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625AbdJBPek (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 11:34:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:34:29 +0300 From: Sergey Matyukevich To: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nl80211: look for HT/VHT capabilities in beacon's tail Message-ID: <20171002153428.dhh47qlza7agrru4@bars> (sfid-20171002_173451_505508_D23935DF) References: <20170830205225.17228-1-igor.mitsyanko.os@quantenna.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20170830205225.17228-1-igor.mitsyanko.os@quantenna.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 01:52:25PM -0700, igor.mitsyanko.os@quantenna.com wrote: > There are no HT/VHT capabilities in cfg80211_ap_settings::beacon_ies, > these should be looked for in beacon's tail instead. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mitsyanko > --- > > This is true for hostapd (at least the one in mainline): it does not > include HT/VHT caps and WLAN_EID_SUPP_RATES into beacon_ies. > But worth noting that there is no clear documentation that I could find > on what IEs could and could not be included into beacon_ies. > > net/wireless/nl80211.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Hello Johannes, Any comments on this change ? Regards, Sergey