Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:35114 "EHLO mail-pf0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994AbeAYSd6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:33:58 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f196.google.com with SMTP id t12so6394943pfg.2 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:33:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:33:55 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Ganapathi Bhat Cc: Kalle Valo , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Cathy Luo , Xinming Hu , Zhiyuan Yang , James Cao , Mangesh Malusare , Shrenik Shikhare Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [2/2] mwifiex: use more_rx_task_flag to avoid USB RX stall Message-ID: <20180125183355.rpmajajr5exxcybb@ban.mtv.corp.google.com> (sfid-20180125_193402_064309_00DA2E99) References: <1516633497-6584-3-git-send-email-gbhat@marvell.com> <20180125071202.0F39560A60@smtp.codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:59:04AM +0000, Ganapathi Bhat wrote: > > I can't find any commit with id c7dbdcb2a4e1, is it correct? > Correct. Actually the commit id c7dbdcb2a4e1 is the PATCH [1/2] sent in this series. What? Why would you introduce a bug and only fix it in the next patch? Does that mean you should just combine the two? Or reverse the order, if patch 2 doesn't cause problems on its own? Brian