Return-path: Received: from mail.neratec.com ([46.140.151.2]:32672 "EHLO mail.neratec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752144AbeAZK1X (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 05:27:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ath9k: AR9003 noise floor calibration support To: Sebastian Gottschall Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com References: <1516692925-6695-1-git-send-email-Wojciech.Dubowik@neratec.com> <87o9ll57ps.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> From: Wojciech Dubowik Message-ID: (sfid-20180126_112726_989702_FA805A07) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:27:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I will try it with again with couple of OEM cards. Is nanostation calibrated for noisefloor? You can see it with modal_eeprom in debugfs. Wojtek On 26/01/18 10:59, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > i dont know if this is a coincidence. but after testing your patch on > a standard ubiquiti nanostation m2 the noise floor looks wrong. > it will stay on -112 which is clearly impossible in 2.4 (before it was > around -96)