Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:52155 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750832AbeBJN4o (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Feb 2018 08:56:44 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f69.google.com ([209.85.160.69]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ekVdz-0007Lr-8R for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:56:43 +0000 Received: by mail-pl0-f69.google.com with SMTP id 36so3873473plb.18 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 05:56:43 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: turn on btcoex_enable as default From: Kai Heng Feng In-Reply-To: <87k1vmeip8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 21:56:38 +0800 Cc: Felix Fietkau , ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: (sfid-20180210_145708_662125_3CF55C3A) References: <20180208052801.15670-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> <56d650e6-d26f-087c-4e86-2e5d4e859414@nbd.name> <87k1vmeip8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> To: Kalle Valo Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On 9 Feb 2018, at 3:16 PM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Sure, but we have to make sure that we don't create regressions on > existing systems. For example, did you test this with any system which > don't support btcoex? (just asking, haven't tested this myself) No not really, but I will definitely test it. The only module I have that uses ath9k is Dell’s DW1707. How do I check if it support btcoex or not? (I resend the mail because my last mail get changed to HTML by my mail client) Kai-Heng > > -- > Kalle Valo