Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:50214 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752052AbeB0QLb (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:11:31 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Igor Mitsyanko , Avinash Patil , Sergei Maksimenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] qtnfmac: qsr10g pcie backend updates References: <20180205150516.16030-1-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <87muzufqw9.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <20180227143753.ee44w6p7qil32xif@bars> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:11:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180227143753.ee44w6p7qil32xif@bars> (Sergey Matyukevich's message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:37:54 +0300") Message-ID: <87o9kas98x.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20180227_171136_768382_6DEC7587) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sergey Matyukevich writes: > Hello Kalle, > >> BTW, I don't see this patchset on patchwork.kernel.org[1], strangely I >> only see v2. I don't know if it's because of problems on patchwork or >> the submitter deleted the patches, but in case someone did delete these >> please do not that. I want to see the old versions from patchwork to >> check the old discussions etc. >> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?state=*&q=qtnfmac > > I guess that was me. After the first review round we reworked the patch set. > So I posted v2 and marked v1 as 'Superseded' in Patchwork. Odd, then I should still see them in patchwork but I don't. Oh well, patchwork is still rough on edges so I'm not surprised. Anyway, I prefer the patch submitters don't change the status themselves and let me do that instead. That way it's easier for me track progress etc. -- Kalle Valo