Return-path: Received: from esa1.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.147.91]:12315 "EHLO esa1.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752774AbeC0NQa (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:16:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:46:22 +0530 From: Ajay Singh To: Claudiu Beznea CC: Dan Carpenter , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] staging: wilc1000: fix for checkpatch and handled malloc memory properly Message-ID: <20180327184622.7f9dd976@ajaysk-VirtualBox> (sfid-20180327_152223_704859_80BB6203) In-Reply-To: <0546cfdf-8767-8309-2bf2-ab5ad96f2c27@microchip.com> References: <1521564944-3565-1-git-send-email-ajay.kathat@microchip.com> <20180321075116.bm6x3c53bahw3c2i@mwanda> <20180321145021.044f4536@ajaysk-VirtualBox> <53a25901-754c-bfe9-169e-d2ed4cb34583@microchip.com> <20180327125213.0594ff79@ajaysk-VirtualBox> <0546cfdf-8767-8309-2bf2-ab5ad96f2c27@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Claudiu, On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:55:52 +0300 Claudiu Beznea wrote: > On 27.03.2018 10:22, Ajay Singh wrote: > > > > Please let me know, in case I have to rework and resubmit this patch > > series to make them into staging branch. > > > > As I suggested in patch 6, I prefer having the same format for > wilc_wfi_cfg_tx_vendor_spec() and wilc_wfi_cfg_parse_rx_vendor_spec(). I > think this could be achieved. To merge them I don't think would be feasible. > > This series could go as is but I would like to see another future patch to > treat the format of wilc_wfi_cfg_tx_vendor_spec(). > Sure, I had noted the review comments received for patch#6 & patch#1. I will include the code modification in another future patches to handle it. Regards, Ajay