Return-path: Received: from esa1.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.147.91]:63073 "EHLO esa1.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853AbeDDFPc (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 01:15:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:45:25 +0530 From: Ajay Singh To: Greg KH CC: Claudiu Beznea , Dan Carpenter , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] staging: wilc1000: fix for checkpatch and handled malloc memory properly Message-ID: <20180404104525.22abe3fc@ajaysk-VirtualBox> (sfid-20180404_071538_917761_70461956) In-Reply-To: <20180328113101.GC26219@kroah.com> References: <1521564944-3565-1-git-send-email-ajay.kathat@microchip.com> <20180321075116.bm6x3c53bahw3c2i@mwanda> <20180321145021.044f4536@ajaysk-VirtualBox> <53a25901-754c-bfe9-169e-d2ed4cb34583@microchip.com> <20180327125213.0594ff79@ajaysk-VirtualBox> <20180328113101.GC26219@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Greg, On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 13:31:01 +0200 Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:52:13PM +0530, Ajay Singh wrote: > > > > Please let me know, in case I have to rework and resubmit this > > patch series to make them into staging branch. > > You already sent a v2 series for this, right? Why respond to the v1 > set? > Sorry for late reply. V2 series was not sent for this patchset. No code updates were submitted for this patch series. It's an independent patch series with 11 patches and had changes different from other patch series. Just for information, the v2 patch series was submitted for different patch series which had 9 patches. Please let me know if any other information/action is required from my side to include this patch series to staging. Regards, Ajay