Return-path: Received: from rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com ([192.19.229.170]:55050 "EHLO rnd-relay.smtp.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754869AbeDCISY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 04:18:24 -0400 From: Arend van Spriel To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Arend van Spriel Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix firmware request processing if nvram load fails Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:18:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1522743495-13004-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> (sfid-20180403_101829_119882_18F545D9) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: When nvram loading fails a double free occurred. Fix this and reorg the code a little. Fixes: commit d09ae51a4b67 ("brcmfmac: pass struct in brcmf_fw_get_firmwares()") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel --- Hi Kalle, This fix is for code currently(?) in linux-next in error path caused a double free. Regards, Arend --- .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c | 36 ++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c index 9277f4c..94e177d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static void brcmf_fw_free_request(struct brcmf_fw_request *req) kfree(req); } -static void brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) +static int brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) { struct brcmf_fw *fwctx = ctx; struct brcmf_fw_item *cur; @@ -498,13 +498,10 @@ static void brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "nvram %p len %d\n", nvram, nvram_length); cur->nv_data.data = nvram; cur->nv_data.len = nvram_length; - return; + return 0; fail: - brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "failed: dev=%s\n", dev_name(fwctx->dev)); - fwctx->done(fwctx->dev, -ENOENT, NULL); - brcmf_fw_free_request(fwctx->req); - kfree(fwctx); + return -ENOENT; } static int brcmf_fw_request_next_item(struct brcmf_fw *fwctx, bool async) @@ -553,20 +550,27 @@ static void brcmf_fw_request_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "enter: firmware %s %sfound\n", cur->path, fw ? "" : "not "); - if (fw) { - if (cur->type == BRCMF_FW_TYPE_BINARY) - cur->binary = fw; - else if (cur->type == BRCMF_FW_TYPE_NVRAM) - brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(fw, fwctx); - else - release_firmware(fw); - } else if (cur->type == BRCMF_FW_TYPE_NVRAM) { - brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(NULL, fwctx); - } else if (!(cur->flags & BRCMF_FW_REQF_OPTIONAL)) { + if (!fw) ret = -ENOENT; + + switch (cur->type) { + case BRCMF_FW_TYPE_NVRAM: + ret = brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(fw, fwctx); + break; + case BRCMF_FW_TYPE_BINARY: + cur->binary = fw; + break; + default: + /* something fishy here so bail out early */ + brcmf_err("unknown fw type: %d\n", cur->type); + release_firmware(fw); + ret = -EINVAL; goto fail; } + if (ret < 0 && !(cur->flags & BRCMF_FW_REQF_OPTIONAL)) + goto fail; + do { if (++fwctx->curpos == fwctx->req->n_items) { ret = 0; -- 1.9.1