Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f176.google.com ([209.85.128.176]:37219 "EHLO mail-wr0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753156AbeDCTxd (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:53:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f176.google.com with SMTP id l49so19850445wrl.4 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT) To: Larry Finger , linux-wireless , Greg KH From: Xose Vazquez Perez Subject: Re: License info Message-ID: (sfid-20180403_215335_945800_BCE1DD13) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 21:53:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Larry Finger wrote: > What is your position regarding license information? Should the standard GPL-V2 > boiler plate be replaced with "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" in wireless files? "GPL-2.0" tag is deprecated [0] . It should be used: for GNU General Public License v2.0 only: "GPL-2.0-only" for GNU General Public License v2.0 or later: "GPL-2.0-or-later" [0] https://spdx.org/licenses/ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html