Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:49692 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751413AbeDCJcq (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2018 05:32:46 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Larry Finger Cc: linux-wireless Subject: Re: License info References: <00c32ffb-9f20-f1a1-1054-ba57828b4db9@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:32:41 +0300 In-Reply-To: <00c32ffb-9f20-f1a1-1054-ba57828b4db9@lwfinger.net> (Larry Finger's message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:22:00 -0500") Message-ID: <87a7ukk53a.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20180403_113249_999347_052F6244) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Larry Finger writes: > What is your position regarding license information? Should the > standard GPL-V2 boiler plate be replaced with > "SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0" in wireless files? I don't think replacing licenses with SPDX identifiers is very important, but I can apply patches if someone wants to convert drivers. And at the moment I'm not planning to require SPDX identifiers in new files. -- Kalle Valo