Return-path: Received: from mail-ve1eur01on0085.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.1.85]:58265 "EHLO EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752460AbeEGUE1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 16:04:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mesh: don't process mesh channel switch unless csa ie provided To: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <1524857196-29399-1-git-send-email-peter.oh@bowerswilkins.com> <1525722286.22388.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Peter Oh Message-ID: <81cf6620-d7f6-50f7-23c5-e1ba693f2907@bowerswilkins.com> (sfid-20180507_220432_266777_461E2353) Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 13:04:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1525722286.22388.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/07/2018 12:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2018-04-27 at 12:26 -0700, peter.oh@bowerswilkins.com wrote: >> From: Peter Oh >> >> There is no meaning to call ieee80211_mesh_process_chnswitch >> without CSA IE provided, since the function will always return error. > I'm not convinced, an extended channel switch element might be present > instead? I expected the comment. Yes, extended channel switch element could be present instead of channel switch element which I missed to take care of. So you can ignore the patch for now and I'll get back with right patch for it. Thanks, Peter