Return-path: Received: from mail-eopbgr40060.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.4.60]:31136 "EHLO EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751093AbeEOTAD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2018 15:00:03 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: DFS Host Confirmation To: Kalle Valo , Adrian Chadd References: <1525110339-25326-1-git-send-email-srirrama@codeaurora.org> <1525110339-25326-3-git-send-email-srirrama@codeaurora.org> <87h8naqel1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87y3gla4re.fsf@codeaurora.org> Cc: srirrama@codeaurora.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org From: Peter Oh Message-ID: (sfid-20180515_210008_256605_67E9465B) Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 11:59:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y3gla4re.fsf@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Sure, every software change can cause regressions. But the thing is that > this isn't an optional, ath10k has to have this to be able to continue > using DFS channels. > Kalle, you said you don't know which exact FCC requirement this is for in another email thread. Then how come you're sure this is not an optional and this approach is right one? Peter