Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:58064 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753992AbeEWHyJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 May 2018 03:54:09 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Ganapathi Bhat Cc: Arend van Spriel , "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" , Amitkumar Karwar , Nishant Sarmukadam , Xinming Hu Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] mwifiex: support sysfs initiated device coredump References: <1526472723-15758-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> <1526472723-15758-4-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> <87h8n7lnfx.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <5AFC7E01.3070503@broadcom.com> Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:54:05 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Ganapathi Bhat's message of "Mon, 21 May 2018 08:19:35 +0000") Message-ID: <87po1mu7s2.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20180523_095441_544438_73EBAA49) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ganapathi Bhat writes: > In V2: > > return ret; > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mwifiex_send_cmd); > > Instead of exporting 'mwifiex_send_cmd' we can prepare a wrapper for > the command 'MWIFIEX_IFACE_WORK_DEVICE_DUMP' in mwifiex module. Let me > know if we can send a follow up. So what's the plan? Can I apply this patch or should I drop it? -- Kalle Valo