Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:51850 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753210AbeEPKJ5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 06:09:57 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Peter Oh Cc: Adrian Chadd , srirrama@codeaurora.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: DFS Host Confirmation References: <1525110339-25326-1-git-send-email-srirrama@codeaurora.org> <1525110339-25326-3-git-send-email-srirrama@codeaurora.org> <87h8naqel1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87y3gla4re.fsf@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:09:51 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Peter Oh's message of "Tue, 15 May 2018 11:59:45 -0700") Message-ID: <87wow3lxn4.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20180516_121011_097147_8BFE9F76) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Peter Oh writes: >> Sure, every software change can cause regressions. But the thing is that >> this isn't an optional, ath10k has to have this to be able to continue >> using DFS channels. > > Kalle, you said you don't know which exact FCC requirement this is for > in another email thread. Then how come you're sure this is not an > optional To me this is a mandatory ath10k feature because if the host driver does not have this DFS channels won't work anymore. > and this approach is right one? That's something you need to ask the firmware team who designed and implemented this. This discussion is going circles, it would be a lot easier if you could clearly say your point. But if your point is just "I don't like this" then there's not much, if any, I can do about that. -- Kalle Valo