Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:37446 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751510AbeEPNg0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 09:36:26 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Arend van Spriel Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] brcmfmac: move ALLFFMAC variable in flowring module References: <1526472723-15758-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> <1526472723-15758-2-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:36:22 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1526472723-15758-2-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> (Arend van Spriel's message of "Wed, 16 May 2018 14:11:58 +0200") Message-ID: <87lgcjlo2x.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20180516_153632_269379_7FA2926A) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Arend van Spriel writes: > The only user of ALLFFMAC is the flowring module so no need to > expose it in a header file. > > Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman > Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts > Reviewed-by: Franky Lin > Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel > --- > Hi Kalle, > > I recall Joe Perches posted patches dealing with broadcast address declarations, > but don't know what happened with those. In patchwork [1] is says 'Not Applicable' > whatever that means. I noticed Johannes set similar mac80211 change to > 'Awaiting Upstream'. Anyway, when applying this patch the patch in [1] needs to > be reworked. > > Regards, > Arend > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10318857/ 'Not Applicable' means that I have assumed that the patch is not suitable for my tree for whatever reason, I guess in this case because it was part of a bigger patchset. -- Kalle Valo