Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com ([209.85.220.194]:33479 "EHLO mail-qk0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752359AbeFYHn4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 03:43:56 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f194.google.com with SMTP id c131-v6so6995946qkb.0 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add support for TERES-I laptop To: Harald Geyer , Icenowy Zheng References: <20180315162510.11669-1-harald@ccbib.org> <20180315162510.11669-6-harald@ccbib.org> Cc: Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Kalle Valo , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andre Przywara , info@olimex.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: <5B309D37.80207@broadcom.com> (sfid-20180625_094441_228451_BDEF2264) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:43:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6/24/2018 6:34 PM, Harald Geyer wrote: > Icenowy Zheng writes: >> >在 2018-03-15四的 16:25 +0000,Harald Geyer写道: >>> > >+&mmc1 { >>> > >+ pinctrl-names = "default"; >>> > >+ pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>; >>> > >+ vmmc-supply = <®_aldo2>; >>> > >+ vqmmc-supply = <®_dldo4>; >>> > >+ mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>; >>> > >+ bus-width = <4>; >>> > >+ non-removable; >>> > >+ status = "okay"; >>> > >+ >>> > >+ rtl8723bs: wifi@1 { >>> > >+ reg = <1>; >>> > >+ interrupt-parent = <&r_pio>; >>> > >+ interrupts = <0 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; /* PL3 */ >>> > >+ interrupt-names = "host-wake"; >>> > >+ }; [...] >> >- This device node has no binding. The "host-wake" interrupt is part of >> > Broadcom SDIO Wi-Fi binding, rather than a generic one. > I think the general mmc and interrupts bindings apply. And the mmc binding > clearly states that for sub-nodes a compatible string is optional. > > However I just realized that the 'interrupt-names' property is not part > of the general interrupts binding, so I guess at least this property should > be removed. Indeed. If the device just used the SDIO interrupt this is not needed. The Broadcom device can use either SDIO interrupt or a so-called out-of-band host-wake interrupt, which is what the above represents. Regards, Arend