Return-path: Received: from esa6.microchip.iphmx.com ([216.71.154.253]:19987 "EHLO esa6.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727780AbeHLO0Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Aug 2018 10:26:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 17:18:29 +0530 From: Ajay Singh To: Greg KH CC: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] staging: wilc1000: avoid arrray of 'wilc_debugfs_info_t' type Message-ID: <20180812171829.1187a0cd@ajaysk-VirtualBox> (sfid-20180812_134839_970775_11A40120) In-Reply-To: <20180812112930.GB25209@kroah.com> References: <1534049265-5600-1-git-send-email-ajay.kathat@microchip.com> <1534049265-5600-2-git-send-email-ajay.kathat@microchip.com> <20180812112930.GB25209@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Greg, On Sun, 12 Aug 2018 13:29:30 +0200 Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:17:41AM +0530, Ajay Singh wrote: > > Refactor code by removing array of 'wilc_debugfs_info_t' type and > > use single variable to store 'wilc_debugfs_info_t' struct value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ajay Singh > > --- > > drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c | 26 > > +++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 > > deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c > > b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c index edc7287..c5f67c9 > > 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_debugfs.c > > @@ -78,29 +78,21 @@ struct wilc_debugfs_info_t { > > const struct file_operations fops; > > }; > > > > -static struct wilc_debugfs_info_t debugfs_info[] = { > > - { > > - "wilc_debug_level", > > - 0666, > > - (DEBUG | ERR), > > - FOPS(NULL, wilc_debug_level_read, > > wilc_debug_level_write, NULL), > > - }, > > +static struct wilc_debugfs_info_t debugfs_info = { > > + "wilc_debug_level", > > + 0666, > > + (DEBUG | ERR), > > + FOPS(NULL, wilc_debug_level_read, wilc_debug_level_write, > > NULL), }; > > > > int wilc_debugfs_init(void) > > { > > - int i; > > - struct wilc_debugfs_info_t *info; > > + struct wilc_debugfs_info_t *info = &debugfs_info; > > > > wilc_dir = debugfs_create_dir("wilc_wifi", NULL); > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_info); i++) { > > - info = &debugfs_info[i]; > > - debugfs_create_file(info->name, > > - info->perm, > > - wilc_dir, > > - &info->data, > > - &info->fops); > > - } > > + debugfs_create_file(info->name, info->perm, wilc_dir, > > &info->data, > > + &info->fops); > > + > > Why go through the extra step here in changing this variable from an > array to a single value and not just make the call to > debugfs_create_file() directly with the individual values like you do > in patch 3? It feels like this step isn't needed at all here, right? > > What am I missing? Actually, while calling debugfs_create_file() it also passed the "info->data", "info->perm" which was maintained in a static variable. So to have the changes in multiple patches, I first tried by removing the dependency of array and later changed the individual parameters for this debugfs_create_file(). Regards Ajay