Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:41370 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727772AbeISRle (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:41:34 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Sid Hayn Cc: sgruszka@redhat.com, Lorenzo Bianconi , Felix Fietkau , linux-wireless , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt76x0: run vco calibration for each channel configuration References: <20180907211312.17918-1-lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com> <20180918114356.GB15285@redhat.com> <20180918120234.GD15285@redhat.com> <871s9r2d3g.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 15:03:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Sid Hayn's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:26:09 -0400") Message-ID: <87worh1yon.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20180919_140359_928757_CB0003EE) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sid Hayn writes: > mt76x0 isn't in 4.18 at all, it's being added in 4.19 isn't it? I'm > not sure you can call it a regression, but adding a new driver with a > known bug that breaks an entire use case (monitor mode) seems silly > when a small and tested fix is available. Pretty please. Unfortunately it's not that simple as you think. And do take into account that the maintainers need to deal with a lot of patches and email so keeping things simple is important. And please do not top post: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#do_not_top_post_and_edit_your_quotes -- Kalle Valo