Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:55277 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726008AbeIESWK (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:22:10 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id c14-v6so8082988wmb.4 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:51:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1529693004-20569-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> <5B30A85C.5080105@broadcom.com> <5B8FB8C2.2040200@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <5B8FB8C2.2040200@broadcom.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 15:51:37 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20180905_155154_669575_E9139C69) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] brcmfmac: fix 160MHz support and monitor mode To: Arend Van Spriel Cc: Kalle Valo , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 13:06, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 8/29/2018 10:17 PM, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > > Hi Arend, > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 10:31, Arend van Spriel > > wrote: > >> On 6/25/2018 6:40 AM, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > >>> On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 13:48, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > >>>> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 20:45, Arend van Spriel > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Here a couple of patches in preparation of monitor mode support. It > >>>>> is mostly about querying firmware for support. While at it I stumbl= ed > >>>>> upon the fact that 160MHz was not completely implemented in the dri= ver > >>>>> so there is a patch for that as well. > >>>>> > >>>>> The first two patches are actually some changes to the patches that > >>>>> Rafal submitted. So this series depend on: > >>>>> > >>>>> [V3,2/2] brcmfmac: handle monitor mode marked msgbuf packets [1] > >>>>> > >>>>> These apply to the master branch of the wireless-drivers-next repos= itory. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10474799/ > >>>> > >>>> I find it pointless to submit fixes for patches that weren't accepte= d > >>>> yet. Let's work on improving original patches while they are still > >>>> pending. > >>> > >>> I sent V4 with changes pointed our by Arend. That obsoletes all (?) > >>> monitor patches from this patchset. I believe it was cleaner to > >>> improve original patchset (not pushed yet). > >>> > >>> My suggestion is to apply patches 3/6 and 4/6 (they aren't monitor > >>> related) and drop the others. > >> > >> Well. Given that Kalle prefers applying "all-or-nothing" I will resubm= it > >> the series addressing the issues you found. > > > > Would you have a moment to resubmit these 2 patches or do you mind if I= do that? > > Found a moment. Should be in patchwork now. Thank you! :) --=20 Rafa=C5=82