Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6411C43382 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86459214C5 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:27:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 86459214C5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726915AbeIZQkI (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:40:08 -0400 Received: from esa5.microchip.iphmx.com ([216.71.150.166]:57837 "EHLO esa5.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726497AbeIZQkI (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:40:08 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,306,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="18459152" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa5.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Sep 2018 03:27:51 -0700 Received: from ajaysk-VirtualBox (10.10.76.4) by chn-sv-exch05.mchp-main.com (10.10.76.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.352.0; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:27:50 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:57:43 +0530 From: Ajay Singh To: Kalle Valo CC: Arend van Spriel , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "Nicolas Ferre - M43238" , Ganesh Krishna - C00112 , Adham Abozaeid - C43058 , Aditya Shankar - I16078 Subject: Re: feedback on mainlining wilc1000 staging driver Message-ID: <20180926155743.032caa37@ajaysk-VirtualBox> In-Reply-To: <87r2ipnxxa.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20180816015243.545cd009@ajaysk-VirtualBox> <87sh3etwoj.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <87o9e2twe9.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <20180817100233.7f1c00d9@ajaysk-VirtualBox> <8736vdv3f5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <5B768574.6060009@broadcom.com> <87y3d5tmod.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20180817143911.5f0ee545@ajaysk-VirtualBox> <87r2ipnxxa.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Organization: Microchip Technology X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi Kalle, On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:37:45 +0530 Kalle Valo wrote: > Ajay Singh writes: > > >> >>> We need help to review and identify if there are any pending > >> >>> items for wilc1000 driver, so we can address those issues and > >> >>> make it ready to move to the wireless subsystem. > >> >> > >> >> I think the best way to get that forward is to submit a patch > >> >> (or patchset) to linux-wireless, that's the easiest for > >> >> reviewers. > >> > > >> > For brcm80211 drivers we used a single patch introducing it under > >> > the wireless drivers folder. Because it was quite a sizable > >> > patch we parked it on the wireless wiki page. Had a few > >> > iterations doing it like that. > >> > >> Another option is to split it so that there's one patch per file, > >> should be even pretty easy to automate that. It's just so much > >> easier to comment on a patch submitted by email compared to the > >> reviewer manually copying code and then commenting it, yuck. > >> > > > > Sure. I will prepare a patch per file send for review as its easy to > > review. > > > > As Greg suggested, I will wait for the merge window to close and > > after completing pending patches to staging, I will start the > > review. > > > > For my understanding, the patches for review will be based on > > wireless-testing branch. > > In this case I think wireless-drivers-next is the safest choise, > wireless-testing also has other trees which might cause conflicts etc. I have submitted a patch series for wilc1000 driver, single file per patch and its based on wireless-drivers-next. I hope its done correctly, please provide inputs so we can address and make this driver ready for mainline. Regards, Ajay