Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A426CC43143 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59841206B7 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="QkJBStqa"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="Tcu8wYDy" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 59841206B7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726738AbeI2CQZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:16:25 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:54708 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726405AbeI2CQZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2018 22:16:25 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9715E601C3; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:51:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1538164267; bh=n8DmFFFU55DyU9Dl731kF67vvW0FFaWHWDjQiyjxWPQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QkJBStqadb1zlVW9w11dAIpx2NqKLTbVLmhXpVmfc9kzlFEEttRW+7OD5aETnynql PgEbWBAimXu/ZsatoBndg1se608yEj3fmNBZkcWpPOLfDsp2B7zGXWNJ4Jz4eyI9/t Asm3SDRIkYZXVxp1VShC1KfkCEYHslJB4e9E/h4A= Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50FF601C3; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 19:51:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1538164266; bh=n8DmFFFU55DyU9Dl731kF67vvW0FFaWHWDjQiyjxWPQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Tcu8wYDye5Z5W+v9e34wIPlVauTg9A3cSQMG5gbZVPBWh1vuAKAaUrEU7N4iwnuk2 rqfIQcPd3Q4OOm9lYeUrHHGb9/vZ/SnJegZIpkjEN7MNZa+n+G7koFgL1W8J36gft8 BMyqzL5aAZnaL3a+AQnYn8zUU3I32lJ8pd5V6kVE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:51:06 -0700 From: Rajkumar Manoharan To: =?UTF-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Cc: Jonathan Morton , Kan Yan , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH RFC v4 3/4] mac80211: Add airtime accounting and scheduling to TXQs In-Reply-To: <4929C006-3452-4C17-9500-8D7485EB538E@toke.dk> References: <153711966150.9231.13481453399723518107.stgit@alrua-x1> <153711973134.9231.18038849900399644494.stgit@alrua-x1.karlstad.toke.dk> <826b6251746ee4d280d532f4ecdc5aa3@codeaurora.org> <87pnx0haud.fsf@toke.dk> <8f7145bf5abe50194bced025a5e739b9@codeaurora.org> <863bc54fbf04441d38dd53f523300a7e@codeaurora.org> <93015743-5D16-4D79-948F-E2F46CF2450A@toke.dk> <7ba8513b0ec5a7c35b396c7739fc2d7d@codeaurora.org> <87zhw2eyfo.fsf@toke.dk> <5d961a5f61de45b85b1b037bcef9270d@codeaurora.org> <44B09168-C08F-4C85-8D74-D576CCC79880@gmail.com> <586459da6ec36edc2284df8533915d62@codeaurora.org> <4929C006-3452-4C17-9500-8D7485EB538E@toke.dk> Message-ID: <34effd2ca6423b33e3871de99022d757@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: rmanohar@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 2018-09-28 04:02, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > On 28 September 2018 12:47:51 CEST, Rajkumar Manoharan > wrote: >> On 2018-09-28 03:35, Jonathan Morton wrote: >>>> On 28 Sep, 2018, at 1:19 pm, Rajkumar Manoharan >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is going to break fairness; we only want to increase deficits >>>>> when >>>>> all stations' deficits are negative. Hence the two loops. Did you >> see >>>>> any problems with those specifically? >>>> >>>> No. I didn't see any issue but the loop won't exit until one txq >>>> becomes positive. >>>> Till then the lock won't be released. Hence I converged into single >>>> iteration. >>> >>> The problem is that the fairness behaviour is changed when there are >>> already positive txqs, but the first one happens to not be positive. >>> That's why there were two loops. >>> >> Yeah.. Understood. we can ignore the cleanup change. > > Great! I'll fold in the rest, test it with ath9k and submit as a proper > patch :) > Thanks. I am seeing higher CPU load. Did you observe similar behavior with ath9k. -Rajkumar