DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 263682098A
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:57:20 -0700
From:   Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
        Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
        Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] wireless: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
Message-ID: <20181004065720.GE896@E570.localdomain>
References: <20181003053902.6910-1-ldr709@gmail.com>
 <20181003053902.6910-9-ldr709@gmail.com>
 <877eizjt5j.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <877eizjt5j.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:06:48PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
> > since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
> > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
> > Cc: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@deine-taler.de>
> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
> > Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Should I take this or is it going through some other tree?
Sure you can take this if you like. If not, Paul McKenney will take it in his
tree.

Thanks,
Lance

> If it goes to via some other tree:
>
> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>
> --
> Kalle Valo