Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199B7C64EB8 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23E420652 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="dgHk831n"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="dgHk831n" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D23E420652 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727819AbeJDTXn (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:23:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33858 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727483AbeJDTXm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:23:42 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBA7F60C8A; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:30:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1538656237; bh=8ebnf39hFGmdUqDwnfXkXAIfckDT/vueoayWFMBXim8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dgHk831niV48a4TYeW4zyP/jVzoId6j1wJiIyEQN3iMWweC2U5zAZ/pCBUiQ5afxj kBl9w7h/DcccGWaDSmGZw3FmSkjp9BCHzyKlcfdwRY0FiTlQka+PFl5xAOuDQOD5KA JIXrrqS+QB4ezAKMGXZXb45DcQIH8mOy4rKe0DT0= Received: from x230.qca.qualcomm.com (85-76-114-39-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.114.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADD7E6043F; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:30:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1538656237; bh=8ebnf39hFGmdUqDwnfXkXAIfckDT/vueoayWFMBXim8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dgHk831niV48a4TYeW4zyP/jVzoId6j1wJiIyEQN3iMWweC2U5zAZ/pCBUiQ5afxj kBl9w7h/DcccGWaDSmGZw3FmSkjp9BCHzyKlcfdwRY0FiTlQka+PFl5xAOuDQOD5KA JIXrrqS+QB4ezAKMGXZXb45DcQIH8mOy4rKe0DT0= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org ADD7E6043F Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Tony Chuang Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka , "Larry.Finger\@lwfinger.net" , "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" , Pkshih , Andy Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] rtwlan: main files References: <1537509847-21087-1-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> <1537509847-21087-2-git-send-email-yhchuang@realtek.com> <20180927135040.GA4712@redhat.com> <20180928092918.GC8323@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:30:33 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Tony Chuang's message of "Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:35:35 +0000") Message-ID: <87woqx28t2.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Tony Chuang writes: > Hi Kale & Stanislaw, > > I am working on the driver code and making some changes that Stanislaw > have mentioned. And I expected that I will finish them tomorrow, what > should I do after I finished them? > > Should I send an RFCv2, or start a new RFC for it ? Like Stanislaw said, RFCv2 is the right thing to do and I see that you did that already. > Because our driver will be renamed from rtwlan to rtw88 for > 8822B/8822C I like rtw88, a good choise. -- Kalle Valo