DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CC3642150D
Message-ID: <3a09443c022b04bc6534416a7f7e436314de653b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] cfg80211: add peer measurement with FTM API
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Lior David <liord@codeaurora.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <pradeepc@codeaurora.org>, luca@coelho.fi,
        Etan Cohen <etancohen@google.com>,
        Roy Want <roywant@google.com>,
        Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:09:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <73dc838a-a703-e587-f1fd-bd492fa900af@codeaurora.org>
References: <20181001133511.25046-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
         <b72e2702-64dd-4ac9-89a4-6fd4d03363ed@codeaurora.org>
         <1538942338.2928.21.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <0c64b665-5dc6-df94-4d49-a3adfc12f745@codeaurora.org>
         <1539252323.3687.207.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <73dc838a-a703-e587-f1fd-bd492fa900af@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 13:05 +0300, Lior David wrote:
> 
> On 10/11/2018 1:05 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks for the explanation. The send to same socket does sound more efficient.
> > > (In our internal implementation with vendor commands we were forced
> > > to send the results as broadcast...)
> > 
> > I suppose we can fix that, in the sense that we can add API to allow
> > vendor commands to know the socket to send back to etc.
> > 
> 
> I think that would be useful in general though as far as I know we don't have
> any pending feature that requires it right now.

Ok. For the record, I have no objection to somebody who needs this doing
it, but it's not entirely trivial so I'm not going to just do it now.

johannes