Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C828FC2BC61 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF5A20657 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="OuQJUmjo"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="lVCmSBu8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8FF5A20657 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726863AbeJ2Xph (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:45:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:49392 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726035AbeJ2Xph (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:45:37 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07969602BC; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:56:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1540824998; bh=PS9h2dV8tyUf8O8S3TzDz8h4g8fBnNKE0wejxYGUn9c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OuQJUmjoEyDVS/Kijb1gPNOiuZzEKdBPSteS9XEW43g5Ihe625cQjavtjz55fmoLk Wd2aMtueuYm7F6sdeWvmwT8cxgcLsGu1R7jrb+zm3H7zQ7MMhx3q0OLQetwrC9YR32 v0ezHwcblN7jSX+D9KIHaDjxA5NqkoI64AzRjBrg= Received: from x230.qca.qualcomm.com (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7364860159; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:56:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1540824997; bh=PS9h2dV8tyUf8O8S3TzDz8h4g8fBnNKE0wejxYGUn9c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=lVCmSBu89I1wNEuTl0yZLEnVr/MyimkrsaEf7phpUKaKtq4O0YbP6cYEKl193F+eF MgOB/OZ9NixOrJX74CdK7jlVwPo14JAwirqqB2ynICzw6Ajtd01vxcCrPolYBgE81u vCDHT1zoLA3POEwEg6Ehd6iPMzk8fklL1mpk1Slc= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 7364860159 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu , Lior David , luca@coelho.fi, Etan Cohen , Roy Want , Arend Van Spriel , Franky Lin Subject: Re: [RFC v3] cfg80211: add peer measurement with FTM API In-Reply-To: (Johannes Berg's message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:29:59 +0200") References: <20181012100827.24195-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <87tvlqp3wr.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:56:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0rser8e.fsf@qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Johannes Berg writes: > On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 12:55 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> > struct cfg80211_ops { >> > int (*suspend)(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct cfg80211_wowlan *wow); >> >> It would be nice to document if these ops can sleep or not. > > I don't think we've documented that *anywhere* in cfg80211, but > everything can sleep there ... > > At the mac80211 level things are different, so there we do document a > case-by-case basis. Makes sense, sorry for the noise. -- Kalle Valo