Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E35FC0044C for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 20:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE03F2081C for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 20:44:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CE03F2081C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727049AbeKFGFp (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:05:45 -0500 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:59298 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726578AbeKFGFp (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:05:45 -0500 Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gJljI-0002yX-99; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 21:44:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cfg80211/mac80211: Add support for TID specific configuration From: Johannes Berg To: Tamizh chelvam , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Matyukevich Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 21:43:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1540230918-27712-1-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org> References: <1540230918-27712-1-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-1.fc28) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 23:25 +0530, Tamizh chelvam wrote: > Add infrastructure for per TID aggregation/retry count configurations > such as retry count and AMPDU aggregation control(disable/enable). > In some scenario reducing the number of retry count for a specific data > traffic can reduce the latency by proceeding with the next packet > instead of retrying the same packet more time. This will be useful > where the next packet can resume the operation without an issue. Not sure I understand this, how can you expect to control something on a per-packet basis using this? Sergey, looks like your A-MPDU control is already in here per RA/TID, and A-MSDU could be added easily? johannes