Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84BAC32789 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881E120862 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="IDrZ9NCx"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="IDrZ9NCx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 881E120862 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387817AbeKFTzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:55:19 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:52918 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387491AbeKFTzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:55:19 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA2826049C; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:30:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1541500246; bh=jEFlFONmjGjqpnbYSDrLrbtqVCdP3VBBGTqKnmRce5M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IDrZ9NCxb+7S5ItGAxPFBKz3cBZjS9XtWVy2f0Y+gnNhFSUDqevfH21GFNz8V7fMt XwNORyEkl1ZeSw7k/52BGs8kbt2XWaj4THdGShoU3zWU29DHWdr3FMOiVoQHEHCwWq 1WgKJkYN7ySjjJBd2X0Mqaw45NxqX4XPUPJe/9+s= Received: from purkki.adurom.net (purkki.adurom.net [80.68.90.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4E4A6053D; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 10:30:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1541500246; bh=jEFlFONmjGjqpnbYSDrLrbtqVCdP3VBBGTqKnmRce5M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IDrZ9NCxb+7S5ItGAxPFBKz3cBZjS9XtWVy2f0Y+gnNhFSUDqevfH21GFNz8V7fMt XwNORyEkl1ZeSw7k/52BGs8kbt2XWaj4THdGShoU3zWU29DHWdr3FMOiVoQHEHCwWq 1WgKJkYN7ySjjJBd2X0Mqaw45NxqX4XPUPJe/9+s= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org C4E4A6053D Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Maya Erez Cc: Ahmad Masri , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wil6210@qti.qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] wil6210: refactor disconnect flow References: <1540975944-30576-1-git-send-email-merez@codeaurora.org> <1540975944-30576-8-git-send-email-merez@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 12:30:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1540975944-30576-8-git-send-email-merez@codeaurora.org> (Maya Erez's message of "Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:52:15 +0200") Message-ID: <871s7ybir0.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Maya Erez writes: > From: Ahmad Masri > > Separate sending command to the fw from the event handling function to > simplify the disconnect flow and track the from_event flag correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmad Masri > Signed-off-by: Maya Erez [...] > +static int wil_disconnect_cid(struct wil6210_vif *vif, int cid, > + u16 reason_code) > +__acquires(&sta->tid_rx_lock) __releases(&sta->tid_rx_lock) > +{ > + struct wil6210_priv *wil = vif_to_wil(vif); > + struct wireless_dev *wdev = vif_to_wdev(vif); > + struct wil_sta_info *sta = &wil->sta[cid]; > + bool del_sta = false; > + > + might_sleep(); > + wil_dbg_misc(wil, "disconnect_cid: CID %d, MID %d, status %d\n", > + cid, sta->mid, sta->status); > + > + if (sta->status == wil_sta_unused) > + return 0; > + > + if (vif->mid != sta->mid) { > + wil_err(wil, "STA MID mismatch with VIF MID(%d)\n", vif->mid); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* inform lower layers */ > + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP && disable_ap_sme) > + del_sta = true; > + > + /* disconnect by sending command disconnect/del_sta and wait > + * synchronously for WMI_DISCONNECT_EVENTID event. > + */ > + return wmi_disconnect_sta(vif, sta->addr, reason_code, del_sta); > +} I don't get use of __acquires() and __releases() in this function. I see similar pattern already in wil6210 but care to explain why this is needed? I don't see the function even accessing tid_rx_lock so I'm very confused. -- Kalle Valo