Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43E2C32789 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A62620869 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="WmnGB3SW"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="IJ+s+2KZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A62620869 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730645AbeKFVRl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 16:17:41 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:38830 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730368AbeKFVRl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 16:17:41 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 800DF60795; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:52:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1541505170; bh=gWcSSXYnE3LredWSZWd3en+2tRTwJZM/56orLVI8/Ec=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WmnGB3SWgPczQS5VnjsNHVhVXfzuYnjTlt8Xqp5KwFVthxvdYMU8+RA+fA5u0R7MO kvZnBcJoSGyPvpodXKJcSjABItD9J2AJT1qFz+gPOcC6aaLM4ODNMcLs3JaU+0fixG dp+zASgoYsITu1CVSa3XJmeMPV5co2UT+TSPpjAs= Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1D360247; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:52:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1541505169; bh=gWcSSXYnE3LredWSZWd3en+2tRTwJZM/56orLVI8/Ec=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IJ+s+2KZ80gC8fzlNJVwNBJfOCDBI52WqKkdaale4pldjvsrrgzmN76SW9Xje53Lx 4MWEnhZTE9Ax5/9yFy5UO/3vdgWteL7RWcpiq+ctRmEgshxWdIXM/k1OBvA2mUU5XP dSrZK3eR2mo1y+7TL3ty2g4pyIqEI3EIHlMwVxRk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:52:49 +0200 From: merez@codeaurora.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: Ahmad Masri , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wil6210@qti.qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/16] wil6210: refactor disconnect flow In-Reply-To: <871s7ybir0.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <1540975944-30576-1-git-send-email-merez@codeaurora.org> <1540975944-30576-8-git-send-email-merez@codeaurora.org> <871s7ybir0.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Message-ID: <6852209b6e110737dc189ec89a49078f@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: merez@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 2018-11-06 12:30, Kalle Valo wrote: > Maya Erez writes: > >> From: Ahmad Masri >> >> Separate sending command to the fw from the event handling function to >> simplify the disconnect flow and track the from_event flag correctly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Masri >> Signed-off-by: Maya Erez > > [...] > >> +static int wil_disconnect_cid(struct wil6210_vif *vif, int cid, >> + u16 reason_code) >> +__acquires(&sta->tid_rx_lock) __releases(&sta->tid_rx_lock) >> +{ >> + struct wil6210_priv *wil = vif_to_wil(vif); >> + struct wireless_dev *wdev = vif_to_wdev(vif); >> + struct wil_sta_info *sta = &wil->sta[cid]; >> + bool del_sta = false; >> + >> + might_sleep(); >> + wil_dbg_misc(wil, "disconnect_cid: CID %d, MID %d, status %d\n", >> + cid, sta->mid, sta->status); >> + >> + if (sta->status == wil_sta_unused) >> + return 0; >> + >> + if (vif->mid != sta->mid) { >> + wil_err(wil, "STA MID mismatch with VIF MID(%d)\n", vif->mid); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* inform lower layers */ >> + if (wdev->iftype == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP && disable_ap_sme) >> + del_sta = true; >> + >> + /* disconnect by sending command disconnect/del_sta and wait >> + * synchronously for WMI_DISCONNECT_EVENTID event. >> + */ >> + return wmi_disconnect_sta(vif, sta->addr, reason_code, del_sta); >> +} > > I don't get use of __acquires() and __releases() in this function. I > see > similar pattern already in wil6210 but care to explain why this is > needed? I don't see the function even accessing tid_rx_lock so I'm very > confused. I assume it is a copy / paste leftover that we missed in the code review. We will remove it. -- Maya Erez Qualcomm Israel, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project