Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6C8C43441 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D192086B for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="NVd/G/q0"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="gXi7UeBM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E8D192086B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389682AbeKPXZg (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:25:36 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:53436 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727772AbeKPXZf (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:25:35 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 82902607B9; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:13:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1542373994; bh=7haAZ9VbauFg7c93zQ+SqlRqK16JF0n01DG6K0ZBBoY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Date:From; b=NVd/G/q0RLlBMqbgt+QSNVwXojjza9lLrSWVTWJBy/nIWxxPCKclXStc1zlCdVBP1 pVX9Q4NSDaEOdk+Sde+jRRPI1ZPEt8U16YPNeUoXrlkhJ7oa1TZZmpjI7wpGAlC7/E fQI2R911+0Z6f/B/Z5LbWvBF/WB1YdLnNMB2qUCY= Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CB586035F; Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:13:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1542373993; bh=7haAZ9VbauFg7c93zQ+SqlRqK16JF0n01DG6K0ZBBoY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:From; b=gXi7UeBMrn4RLcDTrtn76alkjUksWiwZFFSaE/Or9Ip6BeTV6cwcKte931otOxVdM OrTG2MSv9b0A9nI3QiGwEWS2rmlsRAkGgK5u5pmcnI0BYVocCxPMzdP6+L02wDuT6l t/eg+P6hg4WSdAQzFyXNy5QOqkJVBA9f6ANbol4Y= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3CB586035F Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH FIX] brcmfmac: fix reporting support for 160 MHz channels From: Kalle Valo In-Reply-To: <20181108150829.24842-1-zajec5@gmail.com> References: <20181108150829.24842-1-zajec5@gmail.com> To: =?utf-8?b?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Arend van Spriel , Franky Lin , Hante Meuleman , Chi-Hsien Lin , Wright Feng , Pieter-Paul Giesberts , Chung-Hsien Hsu , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com, =?utf-8?b?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , stable@vger.kernel.org User-Agent: pwcli/0.0.0-git (https://github.com/kvalo/pwcli/) Python/2.7.12 Message-Id: <20181116131314.82902607B9@smtp.codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Rafał Miłecki wrote: > From: Rafał Miłecki > > Driver can report IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ so it's > important to provide valid & complete info about supported bands for > each channel. By default no support for 160 MHz should be assumed unless > firmware reports it for a given channel later. > > This fixes info passed to the userspace. Without that change userspace > could try to use invalid channel and fail to start an interface. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Patch applied to wireless-drivers.git, thanks. d1fe6ad6f6bd brcmfmac: fix reporting support for 160 MHz channels -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10674521/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches