DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 910C22147D
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK8U23bW5ov=FfD0xBnio7FwS9NTjoyewfHWZhHAmZNPsA16Jw@mail.gmail.com>
 <a88ba8b1e23b5e461f492f050cfd67c0222cf662.camel@sipsolutions.net>
 <CAK8U23Yi-wa0yT_K2eazTBEsVH3kmYHpZEeMmoDEAdyamdSTqA@mail.gmail.com> <7adcf11c634f31032eaac3c15f8d92b366f14477.camel@sipsolutions.net>
In-Reply-To: <7adcf11c634f31032eaac3c15f8d92b366f14477.camel@sipsolutions.net>
From:   Ramon Fontes <ramonreisfontes@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:47:37 -0300
Message-ID: <CAK8U23a8CMgNboStufh7kVpKSE9URkniWkpeNXi2hr1D3GunZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: mac80211_hwsim: multiple antennas
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Okay! Thanks a lot.

Indeed, the maximum throughput when using only hwsim is in the order of Gbp=
/s.
Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 =C3=A0s 09:30, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> escreveu:
>
> On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 09:26 -0300, Ramon Fontes wrote:
> > Sorry. I meant throughput.
>
> Yeah, well. There's no actual medium (access) simulation in hwsim, so
> the actual throughput you get only depends on the performance of your
> CPU. 33Mbps seems quite low, but of course I don't know where you're
> running this.
>
> Then again, you say you're using wmediumd, so perhaps that *does* have
> some sort of medium simulation these days? I didn't think it has it but
> I may very well be wrong on that.
>
> Try pure hwsim (no wmediumd) and see if you get gigabits, if not then
> your system is probably just too slow.
>
> And then I guess you'd have to look at wmediumd in more detail to see if
> it has some simulations here? I don't know.
>
> johannes
>