Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259BBC43441 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98E02147D for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:28:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E98E02147D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deepplum.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731480AbeKVCDu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:03:50 -0500 Received: from smtp86.iad3a.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.187.86]:40679 "EHLO smtp86.iad3a.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731141AbeKVCDu (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:03:50 -0500 Received: from smtp27.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp27.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A4F2C23A0B; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) X-SMTPDoctor-Processed: csmtpprox beta Received: from smtp27.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp27.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 99EAE24B4F; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from app8.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by smtp27.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7ED1923A0B; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) X-Sender-Id: MAILER-DAEMON Received: from app8.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:28:55 -0500 Received: from deepplum.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by app8.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D73D60C3A; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: dpreed@deepplum.com, from: dpreed@deepplum.com) with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:28:55 -0500 (EST) Subject: RE: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH v3 3/6] mac80211: Add airtimeaccounting and scheduling to TXQs From: "David P. Reed" To: "David Lang" Cc: "Dave Taht" , "Rajkumar Manoharan" , "Make-Wifi-fast" , "linux-wireless" , "ath10k" , "Ben Greear" , "Felix Fietkau" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: <1542814135.446217011@apps.rackspace.com> X-Mailer: mobile/6.0.2 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Really? Tires are Bluetooth? I don't think mine are, but now I want to figure out how that works. 1600Chips/sec is 600 microseconds per chip. They spin at up to, say, radial rates that are a 100 revs/sec and thus take maybe 10 msec. to travel 30 cm. How much warble in a chip frequency is there? Ok, maybe they only need to work when the car is stopped. I would design a tire pressure system that sends, maybe, 10 bits per second, at most. Or calibrate the sensor to produce 1 bit, and use the car metal frame to carry the signal to the computer as a single bit. A very slowly varying sensor can be sensed without needing a battery, by using some passive, tuned circuit. Bluetooth is way overkill, but cheap. I doubt it works well in the application, though. -----Original From: "David Lang" Sent: Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:12 pm To: "Dave Taht" Cc: "Dave Taht" , "Rajkumar Manoharan" , "Make-Wifi-fast" , "linux-wireless" , "ath10k" , "Ben Greear" , "Felix Fietkau" Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] [PATCH v3 3/6] mac80211: Add airtimeaccounting and scheduling to TXQs On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Dave Taht wrote: >> I'm not sure if this was a fluke or not, but at Starbucks recently I sat outside, >> right next to their window, and could not scan their AP at all. Previously, I sat >> inside, 3 feet away through the glass, and got great signal. I wonder what that was >> all about! Maybe special tinting that blocks RF? Or just dumb luck of some sort. > > Ya know, I could definitely see a market for a material like that! I'd > like it for my car, so bluetooth wouldn't escape. That would break your tire pressure sensors (each car is rolling around broadcasting 4 unique bluetooth IDs, not hard to track) David Lang _______________________________________________ Make-wifi-fast mailing list Make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast