Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93FAC67839 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963D12086D for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rsalveti-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rsalveti-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="LBue4hjk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 963D12086D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rsalveti.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726714AbeLKSxU (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:53:20 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com ([209.85.208.181]:32921 "EHLO mail-lj1-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726313AbeLKSxU (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2018 13:53:20 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id v1-v6so14011682ljd.0 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:53:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rsalveti-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HFAmuaR5BVXw6CgtouJkMkubvKolwVgijb2osrDFuw8=; b=LBue4hjksYb7FokicFJ5z7htD0W8b1Aqkmu7l2z2+Dba3Doz7teK+/sawFR6rIp4nv QGbWQKqxh1jGCoGxRtx4CCzCZMXG7o4cuG3vOU45MDnFtYAJADGq/wk5e4r4lAFc/9Zx n9CdgYd/cBMXtYrlJNDp/Ndi5lOrH9Qqhcu9CP2v8yrvPHU/2oYEfJYVT23exsMXma1L yG7bBzpNt3ZflPWwBHg8nSwr6fmj+JPJcswmJzWLwt8dvNQnUdFWtmzCyCfmZgrxktXp SM//rxaWSYtR/PxTy3JqBAK+OFLx+YMuv2+gyWO52pUvjudw/LAig2Z0ffSmD8XTTD1J wHlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HFAmuaR5BVXw6CgtouJkMkubvKolwVgijb2osrDFuw8=; b=tLuFs6EwpF1XrEcOGzAiMybCYDEbvxSP6qj7FtF5QXrvHqHLDEMVWF7GLKXqf6EK15 B6rYkQW5V/JYK5iV85cviDbYIf9xJm6FgYsrEsehnrQxGXkXN5Wrw5He4NFM8FXo5Q/n nb2VNCBEev4jkfR1/FksL4VEuLxbgcMMToPNOecwquundUhTEiEyanQ7LGd035Xs9HLi RKcsYaesXfEWYy8iCAFO9JjJvop1EpSCZn6x7N51c17Qg6XPGmLOS+vmZi2uuwFxPhFS sd0bhvCZRKuIrDHm59HF2kxMssFcn+8luSRjlGNqQVmx9olOGquKh/DmOl2L1Dww1J4B tLdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbRlB8TmPH7hMw9JW+VS3nksfCCcESSEVo8ICi1MKtIsm0JKr++ wi+CZfksrdbCIYAZ+GOiwW/22UTTsDdwls5i+RdEqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WdO/8bajtOt7/xf3sO/EKIllPX17o2W1SDKeAImRefsl5fLaJaY6+hro2apDxtmet9lhKgGsM2YxATi1lMT0g= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9655:: with SMTP id z21-v6mr11775881ljh.136.1544554397949; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:53:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181211181944.GW39861@atomide.com> In-Reply-To: <20181211181944.GW39861@atomide.com> From: Ricardo Salveti Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:52:40 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wlcore getting stuck on hikey after the runtime PM autosuspend support change To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, john.stultz@linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:19 PM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > * Ricardo Salveti [181211 18:06]: > > John, did you have any similar issue on your test environment with > > kernel >= 4.19? > > This sounds like the same issue that got fixed in the dts > earlier? > > f904390ac8b2 ("arm64: dts: hikey: Define wl1835 power capabilities") keep-power-in-suspend was removed in 8883ac1db3e2 ("arm64: dts: hikey: Remove keep-power-in-suspend property"), but I just tested after adding that property back in and made no difference. The funny thing is that it works fine if I disable NetworkManager MAC address randomization. Thanks, -- Ricardo Salveti de Araujo