Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFADC43387 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDB521019 for ; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="RbVYSLV2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726515AbeL2FZl (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 00:25:41 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:36888 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726134AbeL2FZk (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 00:25:40 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBT5P1wM077495; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=/jOzbgmOwXsm+ImaDFXsdQvBJxXZOL86F6amz7mxEww=; b=RbVYSLV2B1kTaM0yuDQ44gDrE7DUq+zFW/ZJM+cgJl2R2Hye5+1PjIDfriujjY2wzPOO MCDuso5/VMbbaa3pCR98aGSqqaAGuDT6hSeA9j8NtcP579C6ILhTiow6sJeU1+T8LKY4 CLDItmHUMgJzu9mWcwbRkn7Dpj3UIL0cwgGzKAYlfUZzCubVuQTY3UyAGkXQ50ALsA3M 0jyZth1BJYbQxHH9pC3KDuhUTXPUlR4QNiwEqUzgZ2uvy2xiseGlp+vSXUhob/uUA2Qp m5i4sINRz8Z42jF1XWOJWynzwhDO0Kdf0XG+L+rDqiWDslEtYNZcaR9zNwHZpZ08qie8 bw== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2pnxedr9m1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:13 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBT5P7r0015570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:08 GMT Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBT5P5B5003002; Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:25:05 GMT Received: from localhost (/67.169.218.210) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:25:05 -0800 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 21:25:04 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Tom Psyborg , Julia Lawall , Andy Shevchenko , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD Message-ID: <20181229052504.GA16315@magnolia> References: <1545555435-24576-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9120 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=623 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812290048 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > > more than enough > > > > I don't know who you were discussing this with... > > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a > clear rule. > > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the > patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. Agreed. Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches" (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :) For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to go wanting for more context. --D > If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into > get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. > > My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always > remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > PS: Please, no more top posting. >