Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4FBC43387 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6402173C for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729658AbfAGPSx (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:18:53 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:60234 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729384AbfAGPSx (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:18:53 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9EB813A; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 07:18:49 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Ulf Hansson Cc: "Reizer, Eyal" , Kalle Valo , KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM , "Mishol, Guy" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , linux-omap , Anders Roxell , John Stultz , Ricardo Salveti Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] wlcore: Fix bringing up wlan0 again if powered down briefly Message-ID: <20190107151849.GC5544@atomide.com> References: <20181217164207.20081-1-tony@atomide.com> <20181218155439.GB6707@atomide.com> <20181220231401.GG6707@atomide.com> <20181223160226.GK6707@atomide.com> <20181228195903.GX6707@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org * Ulf Hansson [190102 12:02]: > > However, if this is about an out-of-band IRQ line, instead of using > the SDIO IRQs on DAT1, I think management of that, belongs in the wlan > (or gpiochip) layers. Yes this can be handled at the gpiochip layer. > We have to distinguish if "down" has a strict requirement to power off > the wlan-chip. > > For example, in "flight mode", is it okay to leave the wlan chip > powered on and thus potentially also having its radio part active? I don't know. If unsure, we should at least have that possibility available for future versions if needed. It might also help a bit with PM measurements :) Regards, Tony