Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D5AC43387 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD35206A3 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="KELjYcJ+"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="fMYKBcPd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728604AbfAHRUB (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:20:01 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:38568 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728398AbfAHRUB (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:20:01 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2891260240; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:20:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1546968000; bh=Z/fsdlkSrWXWnipD4yOxb0GHEOwi50y5i55k2OwF9e0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=KELjYcJ+P4bzqEmFI7Du9uLrLRdcdmgWqq+JSvP3jI0qmBo7MyTH/NGelsHgt21fj KDxFOfSq9F5OzXz+oR1EFHNbWboqXqFpumMhKAHZ5+4ViNqSkBlit0Fd2vFkoKMIT1 Ueb+swDlpBslQRQo28zaJfGIrGeh6Z/vSEPiZYd4= Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5360601D1; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:19:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1546967999; bh=Z/fsdlkSrWXWnipD4yOxb0GHEOwi50y5i55k2OwF9e0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fMYKBcPdrlQvtDvQLK9CwcJZ0DW0BIsslZJTwAM9eHZchFpswXQgupFLOOx9y1k5Z eUsN7nuSoTaBPt7Pl+qTcn+tx/Z0a8MJkHg8OZiNRQlwUXTrQJGqCMBSZwqx9uJq3m 3YsuGFUFHI5UzRl7gbMXBARqeI247RuKWkr7AcEw= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org E5360601D1 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: "Garnayak\, Sarada Prasanna" Cc: "Berg\, Johannes" , Jouni Malinen , Sergey Matyukevich , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] cfg80211/nl80211: add support for AID assignment by driver : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10726899/ References: <751CDD2CADF63344AAEAE35AACE235DCCC3BCD@BGSMSX106.gar.corp.intel.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 19:19:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <751CDD2CADF63344AAEAE35AACE235DCCC3BCD@BGSMSX106.gar.corp.intel.com> (Sarada Prasanna Garnayak's message of "Sat, 5 Jan 2019 13:35:08 +0000") Message-ID: <87a7kbqd6s.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org + linux-wireless "Garnayak, Sarada Prasanna" writes: > Thank you so much for reviewing my RFC patch and here I would like to > address the big concerns/comments about this RFC patch like=20 > > =C3=98 What are the exact use case and potential user of this patch. > > =C3=98 How the Hostapd will handle this get aid and free aid. > > =C3=98 etc. > > In the current implementation in WLAN Stack, the hostapd is assigning > the AID for a station during association.=20 > > But we have a few WLAN hardware which is maintaining the AID in the > WLAN hardware level itself and the firmware checking this AID in the > hardware level according to that the firmware is taking action on > station management > > like (Station DB management, BA agreement, SMPS and TM management > frame etc....). For this reason, we need these get_aid/free_aid.=20 > > Also here I am attaching the Hostapd RFC Patch for the same. PFA > (hostapd patch, call flow diagram and comments on this kernel patch) > > Please review the call flow below: You made few crucial mistakes: 1. You did not CC linux-wireless. 2. You submitted the message as HTML and our lists automatically filter those. 3. You attached a powerpoint file and I would hope that our lists automatically filter those as well. At least I'm not going to open any random powerpoint/word files I receive via email. --=20 Kalle Valo