Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169ADC43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D738920859 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="UlDnvDHO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728437AbfAOINm (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 03:13:42 -0500 Received: from mail-vk1-f194.google.com ([209.85.221.194]:40582 "EHLO mail-vk1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728095AbfAOINm (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 03:13:42 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id v70so402206vkv.7 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:13:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mOwjrPx16pxEEqmyAWoh2wbog93QbCSIHUTMPwWkDog=; b=UlDnvDHOYd5hJgglipj/ld7jFnRO/DXzNHcUwrkTFqHouwQSmr//EgtCZtVZSffRA1 hHC0YCEY/8XjJspdNh5RSUfpZgq626egdXOd1rS9+I9Ej3LXz/PoZYm31ppNFc1ccF9L zSHm+aRl2T4WBhWMJGqoNPEt9KkeKbglQEymY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mOwjrPx16pxEEqmyAWoh2wbog93QbCSIHUTMPwWkDog=; b=kpfbEEKQpkeCzc/zJOsBQ6CerOmPCE2cSxi3tL7F7ymB8wxGFpC2NihPzq5v04+J6d Wya2aEfSxMkOcMKQIDL47BSvG+73be4p5sOquY24UXgv+bjYjLqlPeFstOVm17Nbbwik /tTKP1i6uReLzSKsuL6dvc8NZIjeqIiNZfZB04bKIorF0UcCwkG+BfSnCPODgpFl262O 3Yk0nTrQA7Hd6wRHYGzooayTp9ogVZKSZhGR3j7sp+7eTudTPz0y8ILMr6i9AlneCLvW 2JfTCfqY9zxMPAmqh/gXetIzprODGB/dZlD76iSnBVcULIAqnczPGoMDZYN/q4OREvRn J4HQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdm/yoeo9urOeJxajcaCAoR6A9oIeLpPVFwkOdUVsaXTEoXH/jt /MsAnAA5YrcQw8f9KT3z3jC6JtIcnMqmDaCio24p4g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6gCHBi+6s8lgFGvvg1TGiaWGpigxX44RPrtFeCZOeFlTD8yBRb2V1j9rO5duDIPLB72+3Hfr9nNkPrl6LD58o= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9042:: with SMTP id s63mr991999vkd.17.1547540020554; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:13:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6ccac7db-3ab7-e396-90be-8681a8ee336b@web.de> <0a6e6ca5-3ea0-4f6a-63f1-96187700a4bc@web.de> In-Reply-To: <0a6e6ca5-3ea0-4f6a-63f1-96187700a4bc@web.de> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:13:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: hikey: Give wifi some time after power-on To: Jan Kiszka Cc: John Stultz , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , Wei Xu , Ryan Grachek , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Reizer, Eyal" , Valentin Schneider , Tony Lindgren , Kalle Valo , KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM , "Mishol, Guy" , Anders Roxell , Ricardo Salveti Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 09:10, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 06.01.19 10:53, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 03.01.19 22:32, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 23:21, John Stultz wrote: > >>> > >>> Adding a few folks to cc from the thread here: > >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10734021/ > >>> > >>> As this sounds like a very similar issue. > >>> thanks > >>> -john > >> > >> John, thanks for looping me in. > >> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:38 AM Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> > >>>> From: Jan Kiszka > >>>> > >>>> Somewhere along recent changes to power control of the wl1835, power-on > >>>> became very unreliable on the hikey, failing like this: > >>>> > >>>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:1 failed with error -16 > >>>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:2 failed with error -16 > >>>> > >>>> After playing with some dt parameters and comparing to other users of > >>>> this chip, it turned out we need some power-on delay to make things > >>>> stable again. In contrast to those other users which define 200 ms, the > >>>> hikey is already very happy with 1 ms. > >> > >> According to the discussions we had so far, this doesn't sound like > >> the correct solution. > >> > >> I am intending to post patch soon, however, I am not sure exactly what > >> solution to pick yet. I will keep you on cc - and of course I > >> appreciate if you could help to test. > >> > > > > FWIW, the Ultra96 is also affected. Here I worked around it by using a 10 ms > > power-on delay. The original workaround from the other thread did not help. > > Looking forward to the proper fix now! > > > > Any news on this regression? I will post a (or two) patch during the day. Kind regards Uffe